The annual event on house & housing was partly successful, since it gave chance to each faculty to speak on related issues. However the failure was perhaps on part of defining the limitation or scope of the topic, since KRVIA being desing school. The majority of presentation were hinging on idea at policy level which to mind is non controvercial. The moment you begin to define the territory of thoretical framework, it becomes controvercial or uncomprehensible. I thought the presentation by Rupali, Rohan & myself were of later kind. I assume without predjudice that most of them thought three of us were simply bullshiting. I was very convicing about my presentation, yet it may be criticise of being international without contextual. It is not surprise to me & as if i am not aware of that at all. The inspiration can be global as long as actions are local. The generation of fiftis by large is exactly opposite. The inspiration is local & action are global. The hallmark of the pseudo pan indianness, vastu, hindi cinema certain outcome of that which are convicing themself very hard to determinsitic change of the world from that viewpoint.
Architectural and Urban reciprocal responses are un-cohesive lattice structure. The ideality in perceived cohesion raises the new analog.
Labels
- BOOK REVIEWS (5)
- COMMUNITY AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT (3)
- CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE (14)
- HERITAGE & CONSERVATION (19)
- HISTORY & THEORY (22)
- HOUSING (4)
- KRVIA ACADEMICS (40)
- MODERNISM (1)
- OTHERS (19)
- TRIBUTE TO ARCHITECTS (5)
- URBAN CONFERENCES (3)
- URBAN TRANSFORMATION (32)
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
The masters thesis is about examination of either coordinated or unexplored coordinates of relation among various processes and spatial fo...
-
"The essence of Urbanity is that the different people can act together without the compulsion to be the same" Richard Se...
-
As Amos Rappoport (1969) suggested, " if provision of shelter is the passive function of the house, then its positive purpose is the ...