Lots have been written on Udvada town, its importance as Parsi community town, its history and most importantly the worship place. However the recent attempt to create heritage awareness of the town has resulted positive responses from community and historians. The town is an agglomeration of various architectural typologies (by functions), creating unique experience and bringing sense of place and community living. It is necessary to not only document the place but also disseminate the important lesson on "what is sense of place and heritage".
Architectural and Urban reciprocal responses are un-cohesive lattice structure. The ideality in perceived cohesion raises the new analog.
Labels
- BOOK REVIEWS (5)
- COMMUNITY AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT (3)
- CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE (14)
- HERITAGE & CONSERVATION (19)
- HISTORY & THEORY (22)
- HOUSING (4)
- KRVIA ACADEMICS (40)
- MODERNISM (1)
- OTHERS (19)
- TRIBUTE TO ARCHITECTS (5)
- URBAN CONFERENCES (3)
- URBAN TRANSFORMATION (32)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
The building of institutional architecture has long been obsession of state since independence and the legacy continues till date. Since...
-
As Amos Rappoport (1969) suggested, " if provision of shelter is the passive function of the house, then its positive purpose is the ...








































