Skip to main content


The Urban-ism is often spoken in line of inclusive accent, however in democratic India; the inclusiveness principally represented the view of liberal elite, assuming the authority on aspiration of proletariat mass.  The most triumphant political transformation in recent time, the dramatic & historic change at center sees the surfacing of yet another class, that so far lay principally disregarded within the fold of middle class, transcending the electoral paradigm , perhaps largely described by non-English speaking mass aspired impatiently to move from the clutches of margins. The argument may not receive accolade from many quarters, but it has built class barriers in India. The divide is deeper and culturally widening. The definition of liberals and narrow-minded has drawn archetypical characteristics & world viewed on our planning mission and urban development.  

The group that dwells outside the definition is self proclaimed intellects, loading themselves with blocks of gender, class, region, community and religion with superficial focus & subject of examination as a playing field. Such views on equity on planning process pushes the other margin issues to further marginalization. Attempting to address urban problem with such framework, the worldview of liberals have rendered the cultural mainstream as illegitimate process, while every instinct of such class is branded as communal and chauvinistic.

The liberal seeks for injustice and discriminations, while from cultural perspectives these issues are margins and alien. The liberal devours the cultural transect into moral surrender. The urban India is far from equity and inclusive, drawing political industry and policy makers, creating patronage and antagonist. The imported ideals of inclusive are becoming vehicle of local cynicism & platitudes. The planning commission to large cultural mainstreams is a symbol of power and self. The metaphorically the institutions and academics are trapped within the same framework, evoking rage among the passive majority. 

The planning commission has largely perceived as elite affair and window to global world, transcending nation into notion. The democracy dancing on its inclusive tunes, ideals that perhaps may not have cultural resonance with vast Indian reality.


Popular posts from this blog


The recent trends of architecture demonstrates the pugnacious departure from disciplined modernism. The traditional notion of creativity is slowly replaced by innovation in technological inputs and tools that generate the forms rather than tools that aids the process of generating one. The sinuous forms, non-structured or non euclidean geometry are encapsulating minds and thoughts into unidirectional understanding of architecture as form making process. Having said that the argument of Aesthetic or delight is not only re-created but formally put in to the realm of hedonism. The architecture has never been so polemic at any stage of its evolution. The only reliable source of justification of  the emergence of such architecture is the way cultural ingredient that are induced universally, uniformly and unequivocally across the globe through in-numerous mediums amounting into forced reality.

The sterile or dogmatic ideas are slowly giving away to kinetic notion of architecture, the purity …


The recent publication of book titled " City Riffs" by Richard Plunz ( Columbia University, GSAPP) is based on urbanism discourse (dialogue) in relation to place and ecology. The preface by Kenneth Frampton argues the production of urban knowledge in neo-liberal economy results in aporetic question on limits and scope in the field of urban study. He brings about three important and critical discourses by Christopher Alexander on low rise, high density model, E.J Mishan work on "The Cost of Economic Growth" and Plunz work on "CIty Riffs" demonstrating the linear process of indictment of urban transformation towards maldistribution of resources.
The book brings the analogy of place and ecology, which needs in-depth understanding as both shares concept of place and space. His argument on place based centrality to urban discourse which perhaps has not been dissected theoretically enough as compare to environmental science. He argues further that how biological…