KRVIA / KRMLS - 2013
ARCHITECTURE AS CONTEMPORARY HISTORY
]
SHADOW
OF HISTORY
History
is a trajectory whose formative circumstances hinges on the uncontaminated
breath of cultural studies. They are beyond the secular range of historicity
and theory of knowledge. The historicity is often contaminated as being
condition of symphonic narrative & ideological fermentation that undermines
the intellectual substance. It is often reimburse the value to history as subtext
burden of Theo- political brutalities.
The
empathetic to historical writings and contemplation to indispensible
imperatives are conditions for critical spirit in historical objectivity and
veracity. The
theoretical connectedness and continuity are conceptual possessions in
algebraic notation which bestows the history with analogical forwardness and
emblematic codes, both in continuous and discontinuous notations, the concept
of exponential trajectory i:e historicism. Historicism is philosophical
lecterns as systems of autopoiesis, whose reproductive capabilities of values
are compounded with time dynamism but renunciation in constant entangle of
retrogression. This perhaps encapsulates the theoretical continuity.
Architectural
history is pure and profound and was a result of physical distinctness &
manifestation, of derivable & exponential properties of regional geography,
social norms, cultural and religious ideology. But its connoted puberty exponentially
transforms in persistence in doctrine of endurantism. As cross cultural mosaic surfaced
allowing transfer of knowledge & eclecticism of workmanship, the baroque of
imagination bolted the anguished time propeller. The resulted history served as
archaeological catalyst and disgruntled layer of narcissism, problematizing the
autopoiesis of architectural breeding. The gravity of inflated margins and equitable
endurantism of history resulted in packaging the shifty byzantine of contemporary.
In contrast to that Modernism was seen as moral
impetus of social and technological imperatives but perhaps & unknowingly contaminated with fermentation of anti-historical
consciousness. It also presupposes that contextual distinctions are nonetheless
intellectual brew, setting the strange seditious propaganda of absoluteness in
non- differential modernism.
The history in contemporary mode is combined with
endurantism which in turns makes the history continuously progress through time
to the contemporaneous. As stated earlier, History is a trajectory, whose
comprehension in the variables of memories, fetish, and histories of entities,
when disconnect & connect to the present proficiencies is a construct of
historicism. The variables usually inhibit contextualized interpretation of the
historic events. The historicity thus does not account for the temporal nature
of memory and the changes in perceptions and perspectives during the
exponential transition to the contemporary.
The
historicism is an unfolded conic section of time with an exponential curve of records.
Its construct embodies simultaneity of
folding & unfolding of conic section of time. It lies in that very
domiciliary object of circadian practice, but the interpretation or viewing the
object as part of history and procedural mandate is often relegated to neglected
subjectivity of contemporary. The differential graph of history when laid out
in time gives the transition of legacy and the passage of which is often
expunged. The cause and the effect of historical construct the factual
eventuality of historicity and contextual demarcation of historicism combines
the trajectory, mapping the trail of presence.
ENCRYPTED NOTATION
The act of writing (encrypted) is a relationship of
exponential functions of history. The presence of reading (notation) is in its
value of historicism. The act of writing and reading is an implosion whose
margins derivatives are in memory. The logarithm of history is a repertoire of
encrypted notations.
The encrypted notation is
an exponential function of inscribed archaeology. The depth encrypts the degree
of notation whose formally defined exponent brings meaning of unforeseen &
untold in the process of logarithmic derivation.
The ornamentation and crime is an encrypted
notation of affect where ideological position assumes to be anti-historical in
thought but relegates the history as exponential function to be mutually
exclusive program. Simultaneously the Doric tower by Adolf loose is only a
synthesis of distorted effect whose contemporariness is destined to be encrypted
act of contrived historicism. Similarly, the inscribed archaeology is often
narrated with ambivalent subjectivity, whose transfer from encryption to
notation is often imprisoned in the subjectivity of circumstantial
contemporary.
The condition of historicity is to articulate the relationship of
encryption and notation in a contemporary perspective and construct cohesive amalgamation
of exponential history. The contemporary historicism developed historical disjunction between
mutually exclusive event of encryption and notation. The expounded & impregnable
narrations of literalist set out to institute the continuity between past and
the present as historicity; however the exponential historicism was unable to
position self in such narrations. Eventually in 20th Century modernist
historians precluded the principles of narrations and oral historicity and
raised the specter of historical distances. Historical distances differentiate
due to passage of time and perceptions of people. History gets distorted due to
the effect of past on the present, the rift between the facts and the
narratives. The challenge was to create recorded history so as to avoid the
historical distance in historicity.
The history is a trajectory than contemporary is a
condition of coexist. The trajectory is combined act of writing (encrypted
reading (notation) where history and historicism are suspended between
contemporary conditions. The
contemporary is logarithm of history whose coefficient of presence embedded in
two extremities.
BYZANTINE OF CONTEMPORARY
Architecture is a
language construct with idiosyncrasies in its presence, and its ability to
generate certain emblematic pattern of responses. These patterns have been
altered in its elucidation allowing catalysts of encryption to set in as
endurantist mediator. With the exponential changes in historicism of notations,
the contemporary conditions stands deracinated unambiguous reality. The
byzantine of contemporary has expressions strangely demarcated in residual
membrane, having lost their way to condition to coexist. The history of
architecture is communicative trajectory which reflects its differential
evolution in relation to a variety of domains. If history is a trajectory than
contemporary is presence of expounding exponential agent defining the logarithm
of events. In such circumstances Architecture is reduce to a self-referencing
process which acts parallel and is coefficient of now a closed process of
communications of differential agents. The architecture thus obliges to be an
ocular centric object for exchanges and transactions.
Contemporary is preoccupied
perched conditions between inscription (history) and description (Architecture).
It is dialectic of writing and reading. The contemporary is parallel existence
of independent variables whose exponent is history.
The
contradictions of History & contemporary conditions are often acted as
extinguisher to foreshadow the cleavage
of deterministic and objective program of modernism. Such anti-moral ascendancy
on history and contemporary thought brings about the notion of mutual exclusive
program of architecture that is either or not occur at same time.
The notion of history, contemporary and
architecture are condition of collectively exhaustive phenomenon where if architecture as
logarithm of ideas in realm of encrypted notation than history is exponential
function of constant change in the independent
variable giving the same proportional change. The contemporary is a condition
of differential equation that deems to be the unknown function of
one or several variables that
relates the values of the function itself and its derivatives of
various orders. The
rolling of historicism (mode
of thinking for specific context, geography, local culture) is imagine to be
emanating conditions of contemporary as realm whose component
is history and dynamic reality
Architecture
and history are not mutually exhaustive mandate and are not also mutually
exclusive as contemporary is mediated as unknown functions
whose critical presence is deemed to be neither mutually exclusive nor exhaustive;
hence its embededness is in exponential functions of historicism Otherwise contemporary
is engraving history of apathy, ignorantly adopting nonsensical ephemeral
impulses.
History
is a sub-conscious act lies below the historicism whose contemporary conditions
are parasites of logarithmic fathom of encrypted notations. The disjunction
often reduces to facile facsimiles and fractal scaling of technological
addictiveness, attempting to traverse the passage of history as architectural
apathy.
