Skip to main content
AFFORDABLE HOUSING: WHOSE TERRITORY?

The urbanity has given new definition to  triad relationship of food, shelter & habitat and has become far more complex process. The recent private/public band wagon of affordable housing agencies are yet another attempt to generate land ownership pattern. The attempt is to prove the affordability by numbers that are acceptable by scheme definition and develop its own market strategy to promote. Hence the affordable housing is a marketing strategy for unforeseen pattern of capital building. 

The recent launch of several schemes and its promotion suddenly raises the question on why developers are turning into philanthropic utopias?.The share market has seen phase of slump and as a ploy it is energize the market, the investors are lure to invest in defensive market and subsequently the market manage to gain some capital mobility. Its similar attempt in the real estate where mobility is constrained the affordable becomes buzzword to create capital mobility. The affordable housing is deceptive as one gets closer to understanding of the feasibility. The land cost is the main factor while material cost is the least factor. The only factory has little value is labour cost. The planning objective perhaps have most insignificant value. Every country has clear definition of what is affordable housing, while in India, its perhaps very clearly understood and not defined is that its far from city and un-affordable to travel to work long distance. The real understanding of affordability is in economic opportunity as a social security which goes beyond the norms of price of a unit. The western countries have clear definition that "if you spend less than 30% of your income on housing it belongs to affordable range". The only reliable example in Indian context is the housing loan which is calculated based on 30 times of your monthly income. Hence it defines the affordability which is based on income and expenditure (everything). The ration defines the affordability, while low cost is completely different areas and group. However the affordable housing has become the unchecked paradise for investor.

It is glaring to note that any affordable housing scheme prices are checked in the beginning  during construction and post completion, the prices appreciation is following the similar pattern of normal housing schemes. 

It is not exaggerated to state that the affordable housing is a disguise for land acquisitions in peripheral areas. It also to create vast land bank for controlling future growth by restricting affordable housing, which in turn becomes seamless part of metros.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ARCHITECTURE OF THE ENMESHED CULTURE

The recent trends of architecture demonstrates the pugnacious departure from disciplined modernism. The traditional notion of creativity is slowly replaced by innovation in technological inputs and tools that generate the forms rather than tools that aids the process of generating one. The sinuous forms, non-structured or non euclidean geometry are encapsulating minds and thoughts into unidirectional understanding of architecture as form making process. Having said that the argument of Aesthetic or delight is not only re-created but formally put in to the realm of hedonism. The architecture has never been so polemic at any stage of its evolution. The only reliable source of justification of  the emergence of such architecture is the way cultural ingredient that are induced universally, uniformly and unequivocally across the globe through in-numerous mediums amounting into forced reality.

The sterile or dogmatic ideas are slowly giving away to kinetic notion of architecture, the purity …

URBANISM ECOLOGY AND PLACE: Reading "City Riffs"

The recent publication of book titled " City Riffs" by Richard Plunz ( Columbia University, GSAPP) is based on urbanism discourse (dialogue) in relation to place and ecology. The preface by Kenneth Frampton argues the production of urban knowledge in neo-liberal economy results in aporetic question on limits and scope in the field of urban study. He brings about three important and critical discourses by Christopher Alexander on low rise, high density model, E.J Mishan work on "The Cost of Economic Growth" and Plunz work on "CIty Riffs" demonstrating the linear process of indictment of urban transformation towards maldistribution of resources.
The book brings the analogy of place and ecology, which needs in-depth understanding as both shares concept of place and space. His argument on place based centrality to urban discourse which perhaps has not been dissected theoretically enough as compare to environmental science. He argues further that how biological…