Skip to main content


The KRVIA masters thesis presented by Shalaka on "Representing Third place " brings about the argument of representation of every day. The thesis argued that the Cartesian system of mapping and representing manages to engrave the rational and logical framework of functioning of cities. In such endeavor of representation, it often misses out the everyday component of the urban experience. The everyday of urban experiences constitute many overlapping of ideas and imagination, with complimenting or contradictory meanings embedded in aesthetic, intellectual, social, political and economic necessities. 

The understanding of everyday begins with the ephemeral presence of experiences that have sense of simultaneity, multiplicity, which in turn gives character to the place and city. The thesis attempts to decode the "Lived" dimension of everyday through its investigation in spatial and temporal grains and builds the symbiotic relation among such diverse components. 

The urban components moved from various tangible scales and dimensions to intangible realm of sensorial aspects. The third place derives its impetus from third space (Edward Soja) where it argues on notion of space through spatiality and spontaneity. The method is speculative, open for interpretation, vibrant & full of surprises and spontaneity. The demonstration of the thesis raises lots of question: how much it yields the geographical configuration of place, how do we quantify constitutionality of perception and behavior and what is the role of place making in the entire process or how do local history contributes in understanding of everyday.

Perhaps this may be the beginning of the conceptualization note of irregular or undisciplined aspects of Indian cities. The developed framework may have limitation in representation of intense everyday as it always requires to re-configure as per the site conditions, yet navigating the argument through the first layer of components of everyday narratives brings theoretical conception of fundamental argument on representation.


Popular posts from this blog


The recent trends of architecture demonstrates the pugnacious departure from disciplined modernism. The traditional notion of creativity is slowly replaced by innovation in technological inputs and tools that generate the forms rather than tools that aids the process of generating one. The sinuous forms, non-structured or non euclidean geometry are encapsulating minds and thoughts into unidirectional understanding of architecture as form making process. Having said that the argument of Aesthetic or delight is not only re-created but formally put in to the realm of hedonism. The architecture has never been so polemic at any stage of its evolution. The only reliable source of justification of  the emergence of such architecture is the way cultural ingredient that are induced universally, uniformly and unequivocally across the globe through in-numerous mediums amounting into forced reality.

The sterile or dogmatic ideas are slowly giving away to kinetic notion of architecture, the purity …


The recent publication of book titled " City Riffs" by Richard Plunz ( Columbia University, GSAPP) is based on urbanism discourse (dialogue) in relation to place and ecology. The preface by Kenneth Frampton argues the production of urban knowledge in neo-liberal economy results in aporetic question on limits and scope in the field of urban study. He brings about three important and critical discourses by Christopher Alexander on low rise, high density model, E.J Mishan work on "The Cost of Economic Growth" and Plunz work on "CIty Riffs" demonstrating the linear process of indictment of urban transformation towards maldistribution of resources.
The book brings the analogy of place and ecology, which needs in-depth understanding as both shares concept of place and space. His argument on place based centrality to urban discourse which perhaps has not been dissected theoretically enough as compare to environmental science. He argues further that how biological…